Matilda Smith Net Worth

January 1, 2020

Matilda Smith Net Worth

How rich is Matilda Smith? For this question we spent 12 hours on research (Wikipedia, Youtube, we read books in libraries, etc) to review the post.

The main source of income: Celebrities
Total Net Worth at the moment 2021 year – is about $74,2 Million.



Matilda Smith information Birth date: 1854-01-01 Death date: 1926-01-01 Birth place: Bombay, India Profession:Camera Department

Height, Weight

:How tall is Matilda Smith – 1,64m.
How much weight is Matilda Smith – 82kg


Matilda Smith Net Worth
Matilda Smith Net Worth
Matilda Smith Net Worth
Matilda Smith Net Worth


Matilda Smith (1854–1926) was a botanical illustrator whose work appeared in Curtiss Botanical Magazine for over forty years.The long-running journal required a dedicated illustrator, and when Joseph Hooker sought a replacement, his second cousin Matilda Smith was inducted to become Kews Botanical illustrator. She learned the craft that her immediate predecessor had described as ‘the analysis of a dried flower, from an herbarium specimen, perhaps very small, worm-eaten and gluey, and having no apparent analogy to any known plant.’Smith was to become first official botanical artist of the leading authority, the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Between 1878 and 1923, Smith drew over 2,300 plates for the Curtiss and other publications. She also made reproductions for the library of the institution, which were added to the incomplete works held there.Associate of the Linnean Society (1921), the second woman to have been appointed there. Plant genera, Smithiantha and Smithiella, were named in her honour.
Biography,Corpse flower, Amorphophallus titanum by Matilda Smith. Plate from Curtiss Botanical Magazine, 1891. Smith drew this plant during its first blooming at Kew Gardens in 1889.Matilda Smith was born in Bombay, India, on July 30, 1854, but her family emigrated to England when she was a small child. Her interests in botany and botanical art were fostered by her second cousin Joseph Dalton Hooker, whose daughter Harriet would also go on to become a botanical illustrator. Hooker was then the director of Kew Gardens and a talented draughtsman in his own right, and he brought Smith into the Gardens to train as an illustrator.Smith especially admired the work of Walter Hood Fitch, who was then the lead artist for Curtiss Botanical Magazine. Despite her limited artistic training, Hooker encouraged her to show the magazine her own work, and in 1878 it first published one of her drawings. A dispute over pay between Fitch and Hooker—for whom Fitch had been preparing illustrations for several books—led to Fitch leaving the long-running magazine in 1877. One consequence was that Smith rapidly became a key illustrator at the magazine, at first working alongside Thiselton-Dyer. In the period 1879–1881, each issue included some 20 of her drawings, and by 1887 she was almost the sole illustrator for the magazine. In 1898, she was appointed the magazines sole official artist. Over the forty-odd years between 1878 and 1923, Smith drew more than 2,300 plates for the magazine—only 600 fewer than Fitch, although she received much less recognition for this achievement in her own lifetime. As late as the mid 20th century, art teacher Wilfrid Blunt, in his book The Art of Botanical Illustration, dismissed her as an artist of inferior skills, praising her faintly for her charm, her work ethic, and her usefulness in creating a record of otherwise unpictured plants.[11] In this he follows a pattern first noticeable in the Victorian era of progressively devaluing botany and botanical art as women entered the field professionally.[12] Other authors, however, both now and in her own day, have admired the clarity and precision of her drawing, and her four decades of employment at the center of the British botanical world testifies to a continuing value for her skills.In the course of Smiths long association with Kew Gardens, she created 1,500 plates for volumes of Icones Plantarum, a monumental survey of Kews plants then being edited by Hooker. Beginning with Plate 1354, she was the sole artist for this series, with funds being provided to keep her in this role for as long as she chose to do it. She also made reproductions of plates missing from incomplete volumes in Kews library, and she became the first botanical artist to extensively depict the flora of New Zealand. She was especially admired for her ability to create credible illustrations from dried, flattened, and sometimes imperfect specimens. Her exceptional contributions to Kew Gardens led to her being designated the first official botanical artist of Kew Gardens in 1898. In 1921, the year she retired from Kew, she was named an associate of the Linnean Society—only the second woman to have achieved this honor. She was also awarded the Silver Veitch Memorial Medal of the Royal Horticultural Society for her botanical draughtsmanship generally and for her contributions to Curtiss Botanical Magazine in particular.The plant genera Smithiantha (in the family Gesneriaceae) and Smithiella (viz. Smithiella myriantha, a synonym of Pilea myriantha) were named in her honor.Smith died in 1926 and is buried in Richmond Cemetery.


Wikipedia Source: Matilda Smith

No Comments

Leave a Reply